Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

  • time icon24/7 online - support@tutoringspots.com
  • phone icon1-316-444-1378 or 44-141-628-6690
  • login iconLogin

Week – 6 : Discussion

in North Carolina
TutorialThe company you work for has just won a large contract. Part of the contract involves installing a high-powered laser on a spacecraft which will target and hit a passing asteroid. Your class all graduated and found jobs with this company. Now together you must manage the design of this project through to test. What questions do you need to ask? Where will you go get those answers? What skills will you need? How will you gain those skills? What are the subsystems associated with this project? To what other systems will your system interface? How will you manage that interface and determine requirements? What are the phases and strategies which can be used in the design process through to testing? What is the test plan? How will you do the testing? Will you take the system into space before you test it? Will you test parts or the whole system?
You are to spend the week interacting with your colleagues in this course answering these questions and working through a strategy for the design and test. You are all a team. Work together. By the end of the week, you should make a final post in which you answer these questions yourself using the information you gained from interacting with your colleagues. You should also provide a preliminary block diagram of the system.
Your instructor may provide some tips along the way for you to consider or may provide some additional scope for the project at his own discretion.
The initial post and two response posts do NOT apply for this discussion forum. The expectations are higher. Get involved, participate, and have fun.
Electrical Engineering
Log in to access today

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Week 6 discussion

Week 6 discussion

Order Description

Progressive Issues in Health
As you review your Learning Resources this week, consider the importance of emerging issues and how they might impact professions and communities. What is currently changing in your health field? Consider how this might impact communication efforts, information flow, or advancements in technology. For this Discussion, research and select an emerging issue in your health field.
By Day 4, post a brief description of an emerging issue in your health field. Then, explain why you think it is emerging and how it may impact your field. Expand on your insights utilizing the Learning Resources.
Use APA formatting for your discussion and to cite your resources.

CATEGORY    EXCELLENT     GOOD     FAIR     POOR    SCORE
Discussion Posting Content

(60 possible points)    Discussion posting demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting provides significant detail including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources, and discerning ideas.
(54–60 points)    Discussion posting demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting provides moderate detail (including at least one pertinent example), evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources, and discerning ideas.
(48–53 points)    Discussion posting demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting may be lacking or incorrect in some area, or in detail and specificity, and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.
(42–47 points)    Discussion posting demonstrates poor or no understanding of the concepts and key points of the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting is incorrect and/or shallow and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.
(0–41 points)         Peer Feedback and Interaction

(20 possible points)    Student interacts frequently with peers. The feedback postings and responses to questions are excellent and fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes.
(18–20 points)    Student interacts moderately with peers. The feedback postings and responses to questions are good but may not fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes.
(16–17 points)    Student interacts minimally with peers or the feedback postings, and responses to questions only partially contribute to the quality of interaction by offering insufficient constructive critique or suggestions, shallow questions, or providing poor quality additional resources.
(14–15 points)    Student does not interact with peers (0 points) or the feedback postings and responses to questions do not contribute to the quality of interaction by offering any constructive critique, suggestions, questions, or additional resources.
(0–13 points)         Writing

(20 possible points)    Postings are well organized, use scholarly tone, contain original writing and proper paraphrasing, follow APA style, contain very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and are fully consistent with graduate level writing style.
(18–20 points)    Postings are mostly consistent with graduate level writing style. Postings may have some small organization, scholarly tone, writing, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors.
(16–17 points)    Postings are somewhat below graduate level writing style. Postings may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or show moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing.
(14–15 points)    Postings are well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or show heavy reliance on quoting.
(0–13 points)         Instructor comments:

Total Score (100 possible points):          points

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Week 6 discussion

Week 6 discussion

Order Description

Progressive Issues in Health
As you review your Learning Resources this week, consider the importance of emerging issues and how they might impact professions and communities. What is currently changing in your health field? Consider how this might impact communication efforts, information flow, or advancements in technology. For this Discussion, research and select an emerging issue in your health field.
By Day 4, post a brief description of an emerging issue in your health field. Then, explain why you think it is emerging and how it may impact your field. Expand on your insights utilizing the Learning Resources.
Use APA formatting for your discussion and to cite your resources.

CATEGORY    EXCELLENT     GOOD     FAIR     POOR    SCORE
Discussion Posting Content

(60 possible points)    Discussion posting demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting provides significant detail including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources, and discerning ideas.
(54–60 points)    Discussion posting demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting provides moderate detail (including at least one pertinent example), evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources, and discerning ideas.
(48–53 points)    Discussion posting demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting may be lacking or incorrect in some area, or in detail and specificity, and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.
(42–47 points)    Discussion posting demonstrates poor or no understanding of the concepts and key points of the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting is incorrect and/or shallow and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.
(0–41 points)         Peer Feedback and Interaction

(20 possible points)    Student interacts frequently with peers. The feedback postings and responses to questions are excellent and fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes.
(18–20 points)    Student interacts moderately with peers. The feedback postings and responses to questions are good but may not fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes.
(16–17 points)    Student interacts minimally with peers or the feedback postings, and responses to questions only partially contribute to the quality of interaction by offering insufficient constructive critique or suggestions, shallow questions, or providing poor quality additional resources.
(14–15 points)    Student does not interact with peers (0 points) or the feedback postings and responses to questions do not contribute to the quality of interaction by offering any constructive critique, suggestions, questions, or additional resources.
(0–13 points)         Writing

(20 possible points)    Postings are well organized, use scholarly tone, contain original writing and proper paraphrasing, follow APA style, contain very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and are fully consistent with graduate level writing style.
(18–20 points)    Postings are mostly consistent with graduate level writing style. Postings may have some small organization, scholarly tone, writing, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors.
(16–17 points)    Postings are somewhat below graduate level writing style. Postings may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or show moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing.
(14–15 points)    Postings are well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or show heavy reliance on quoting.
(0–13 points)         Instructor comments:

Total Score (100 possible points):          points

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes